What is UDRS - Umpire's Decision Review System in Cricket?
We all know that in cricket, the on-field umpires have the authorities to make any decision regarding any dismissal or any other query as this is the standard practice in cricket. But sometimes, there may be wrong decisions from the umpires as human errors. One feels that there should always be the scope of scrutiny in the decisions that arise the doubt. Well, there can’t be such a scope for every decision that the umpires make but the ICC has done it to some extent by implementing The UDRS – Umpire’s Decision Review System. It is also called DRS – Decision Review System
What is the UDRS or DRS system?
The UDRS or DRS system allows a team to review the umpire’s
decision if they feel it was incorrect. Teams can do this by referring to the
third umpire or the TV umpire after the decision is made by the on-field
umpires. There are certain limits within which the teams can take advantage of
this system.
In Test matches the DRS system was first time tested between India
vs Sri Lanka in 2008. It was officially adopted by the ICC in 2009 in a test
match between New Zealand and Pakistan. In One-Day International Matches, it
was first time used in a series between Australia and England in 2011. In
Twenty20 International matches, it was first time used in India vs Australia
match in 2017. The third umpire's conversations with the on-field umpires can now
be heard since 2014.
How DRS is used?
A fielding team can use this system to argue against a “NOT OUT’
decision and a batting team can use this system to argue against an “OUT”
decision. The bowling team captain or the batsman being dismissed can make a
“T” signal to the umpire if they want to take a review. Reviews can only be
taken within 15 seconds after the on-filed umpires make a decision. The reviews
can only be used if the criteria of the dismissal are fulfilled; for example,
the umpires may check whether the ball is grounded before it is caught or
whether a batsman has edge it or not. In such cases, the umpires need to make
the soft signal towards the third umpire who can only overturn his soft signal
decision only if there are conclusive evidences against it. Otherwise the
decision will stay. Likewise, if the ball hits the pads and the LBW dismissal
criteria are fulfilled then only the decision can be referred.
When the decisions are referred to the TV umpire, he uses a lot of
technologies to determine the final outcome of the decision. Those are
explained hereunder:
Components of UDRS system
Apart from the ultra-slow motion replay system, there are some
other components used to help this system such as;
Hawk-Eye prediction
Hawk-Eye is a system which identifies the path of the ball
virtually after it has been hit on the body or the pad of a batsman. This
system shows the imaginary trajectory of balls that where it is pitched, its
line and the bounce as well. Hawk-eye prediction is so much useful to check the
contact of the ball, whether it is in line with the stumps or not.
Snicko Meter or Ultra-edge meter:
Snicko meter also called Ultra-edge can be used to see if the ball
has touched the bat or somewhere else. There are tiny microphones placed at the
bottom of the stumps which are meant to help this Ultra-edge.
Hot-Spot Technology:
This is an infrared based thermal imaging technology that examines
and shows the contact of the ball with the bat or with any other sporting gear
of the batsman/player or even his body. It is based on the temperature ranges,
as the temperature changes after the balls hits the bats. It is shown by a dot
or a patch on the bat or wherever the ball hit. It is called hot spot.
“Umpires’s call” is a term in this system where it keeps the
decision unchanged from that of the original decision by the on-field umpires.
The reason of “Umpire’s call” is that the ball may not be certainly in the area
where it is hitting such that the original decision could be overturned. The
teams would not be losing their review if this system shows “Umpire’s call”.
Advantages & Drawbacks
There are always some advantages and disadvantages of any system,
and same has been the case with this system too. It is very good system because
it reduces the risk of being victim of wrong decision which can make teams
suffer. This system uses technologies such that it completely examine the
delivery and point of contact of a ball.
There are also some disadvantages as this system is not yet 100%
sure about it’s components as claimed by many countries as of now. Moreover,
some of the legends of the game and experts claim it’s usage as superfluous.
Even the legendary umpire Dicky Bird criticized this system, saying that it
undermines the authorities of the on-filed umpires.
So, there are always some ifs and buts in any matter especially
which attracts a lot of opinions. I personally feel that this system is right
choice as far as it shows what is right and what is wrong.
Thanks
Rahul
Excellent
ReplyDeleteNicely described
ReplyDeleteNikesh
DeleteVery good
ReplyDeleteGreat information bro
ReplyDelete